CERNlogo.gif

Project

Author

Ivan Podadera Aliseda

Subject

Top cover study

Prepared For

CERN

Project Created

Wednesday, October 15, 2003 at 7:52:37 PM

Project Last Modified

Friday, October 24, 2003 at 9:48:13 AM

Report Created

Friday, October 24, 2003 at 9:49:04 AM

Software Used

ANSYS 7.1

Database

C:\RFQ mechanical drawings\COVER (for DS).dsdb



1. Summary

This report documents design and analysis information created and maintained using the ANSYS® engineering software program. Each scenario listed below represents one complete engineering simulation.

Scenario 1


2. Introduction

The ANSYS CAE (Computer-Aided Engineering) software program was used in conjunction with 3D CAD (Computer-Aided Design) solid geometry to simulate the behavior of mechanical bodies under thermal/structural loading conditions. ANSYS automated FEA (Finite Element Analysis) technologies from ANSYS, Inc. to generate the results listed in this report.

Each scenario presented below represents one complete engineering simulation. The definition of a simulation includes known factors about a design such as material properties per body, contact behavior between bodies (in an assembly), and types and magnitudes of loading conditions. The results of a simulation provide insight into how the bodies may perform and how the design might be improved. Multiple scenarios allow comparison of results given different loading conditions, materials or geometric configurations.

Convergence and alert criteria may be defined for any of the results and can serve as guides for evaluating the quality of calculated results and the acceptability of values in the context of known design requirements.

The discussions below follow the organization of information in the ANSYS "Explorer" user interface. Each scenario corresponds to a unique branch in the Explorer "Outline". Names emphasized in "double quotes" match preferences set in the user interface.

All values are presented in the "Metric (mm, kg, MPa, °C, s)" unit system.

Notice

Do not accept or reject a design based solely on the data presented in this report. Evaluate designs by considering this information in conjunction with experimental test data and the practical experience of design engineers and analysts. A quality approach to engineering design usually mandates physical testing as the final means of validating structural integrity to a measured precision.


3. Scenario 1

3.1. "Model"

"Model" obtains geometry from the Autodesk® Mechanical Desktop® assembly "C:\RFQ mechanical drawings\COVER (for DS).dwg".

Table 3.1.1. Bodies
Name Material Bounding Box (mm) Mass (kg) Volume (mm³) Nodes Elements
"TOP_FLANGE_1" "Stainless Steel" 323.0, 15.0, 950.0 30.04 3.88×106 22706 11675
"JOINT_SUPPORT_1" "Stainless Steel" 90.0, 12.0, 50.0 0.31 40,500.0 370 49
"DAMY_FLANGES_1" "Stainless Steel" 109.0, 30.0, 109.0 0.16 20,169.02 8508 1160
"FLANGE DN100 ISO-K_1,~PART1_1" "Stainless Steel" 129.0, 12.0, 129.0 0.37 47,376.0 6934 3700
"DAMY2_1" "Stainless Steel" 109.0, 30.0, 109.0 0.16 20,169.02 8508 1160
"DAMY3_1" "Stainless Steel" 109.0, 30.0, 109.0 0.16 20,169.02 8508 1160
"DAMY4_1" "Stainless Steel" 109.0, 30.0, 109.0 0.16 20,169.02 8508 1160
"JOINT2_1" "Stainless Steel" 90.0, 12.0, 50.0 0.31 40,500.0 370 49
"BLANK2_1" "Stainless Steel" 129.0, 12.0, 129.0 1.16 149,183.63 5872 3089
"F2_1" "Stainless Steel" 129.0, 12.0, 129.0 0.37 47,376.0 6934 3700
"BLANK3_1" "Stainless Steel" 129.0, 12.0, 129.0 1.16 149,183.63 5872 3089
"F3_1" "Stainless Steel" 129.0, 12.0, 129.0 0.37 47,376.0 6934 3700
"F4_1" "Stainless Steel" 129.0, 12.0, 129.0 0.37 47,376.0 6934 3700
"BLANK4_1" "Stainless Steel" 129.0, 12.0, 129.0 1.16 149,183.63 5872 3089
"BLANK FLANGE DN100 ISO-K_1,PART" "Structural Steel" 129.0, 12.0, 129.0 1.17 149,183.63 5872 3089

3.1.1. Contact

Table 3.1.1.1. Contact Conditions
Name Type Associated Bodies Normal Stiffness Scope Mode Behavior Formulation Initial Interface Treatment Thermal Conductance
"Contact Region" Bonded "JOINT_SUPPORT_1" and "TOP_FLANGE_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 2" Bonded "DAMY_FLANGES_1" and "TOP_FLANGE_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 3" Bonded "DAMY2_1" and "TOP_FLANGE_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 4" Bonded "DAMY3_1" and "TOP_FLANGE_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 5" Bonded "DAMY4_1" and "TOP_FLANGE_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 6" Bonded "JOINT2_1" and "TOP_FLANGE_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 7" Bonded "FLANGE DN100 ISO-K_1,~PART1_1" and "DAMY_FLANGES_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 10" Bonded "F2_1" and "DAMY2_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 11" Bonded "F3_1" and "DAMY3_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 12" Bonded "F4_1" and "DAMY4_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 13" Bonded "F2_1" and "BLANK2_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 14" Bonded "F3_1" and "BLANK3_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 15" Bonded "BLANK4_1" and "F4_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled
"Contact Region 16" Bonded "BLANK FLANGE DN100 ISO-K_1,PART" and "FLANGE DN100 ISO-K_1,~PART1_1" Program Controlled Automatic Symmetric Pure Penalty Adjusted to Touch Program Controlled

3.1.2. Mesh

No mesh controls specified.

3.2. "Environment"

"Environment" contains all loading conditions defined for "Model" in this scenario.

Standard Earth Gravity

The following tables list local loads and supports applied to specific geometry.

3.2.1. Structural Loading

Table 3.2.1.1. Structural Loads
Name Type Magnitude Vector Reaction Force Reaction Force Vector Reaction Moment Reaction Moment Vector Associated Bodies
"Pressure" Surface Pressure 0.1 MPa N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A "TOP_FLANGE_1"
"Pressure 2" Surface Pressure 0.1 MPa N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A "BLANK2_1", "BLANK3_1" and "BLANK4_1"
"Force" Surface Force 100.0 N [6.47×10-41 N x, -100.0 N y,6.1×10-15 N z] N/A N/A N/A N/A "JOINT2_1"
"Force 2" Surface Force 100.0 N [2.12×10-17 N x, -100.0 N y,4.44×10-14 N z] N/A N/A N/A N/A "JOINT_SUPPORT_1"

3.2.2. Structural Supports

Table 3.2.2.1. Structural Supports
Name Type Reaction Force Reaction Force Vector Reaction Moment Reaction Moment Vector Associated Bodies
"Fixed Support" Fixed Edge 30,917.4 N [5.63×10-7 N x, 30,917.4 N y, -1.1×10-5 N z] 485,716.79 N·mm [240,444.85 N·mm x, 0.49 N·mm y, 422,027.33 N·mm z] "TOP_FLANGE_1"

3.3. "Solution"

"Solution" contains the calculated response for "Model" given loading conditions defined in "Environment".

It was selected that the program would choose the solver used in this solution.

3.3.1. Structural Results

Table 3.3.1.1. Values
Name Scope Orientation Minimum Maximum Alert Criteria
"Directional Deformation" Surface(s) on "JOINT_SUPPORT_1"X Axis -2.27×10-3 mm 9.1×10-4 mm None
"Total Deformation" All Bodies In "Model"Global 0.0 mm 8.79×10-2 mm None

Appendixes

A1. Scenario 1 Figures

No figures to display.

A2. Definition of "Structural Steel"

Table A2.1. "Structural Steel" Properties
Name Type Value
Modulus of Elasticity Temperature-Independent 200,000.0 MPa
Poisson's Ratio Temperature-Independent 0.3
Mass Density Temperature-Independent 7.85×10-6 kg/mm³
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion Temperature-Independent 1.2×10-5 1/°C
Thermal Conductivity Temperature-Independent 0.06 W/mm·°C
Specific Heat Temperature-Independent 434.0 J/kg·°C

Table A2.2. "Structural Steel" Stress Limits
Name Type Value
Tensile Yield Strength Temperature-Independent 250.0 MPa
Tensile Ultimate Strength Temperature-Independent 460.0 MPa
Compressive Yield Strength Temperature-Independent 250.0 MPa
Compressive Ultimate Strength Temperature-Independent 0.0 MPa

Table A2.1. Thermal Conductivity vs. Temperature
Table0001.jpg (512x384 pixels)

Table A2.2. Alternating Stress vs. Cycles
Table0002.jpg (512x384 pixels)

A3. Definition of "Stainless Steel"

Table A3.1. "Stainless Steel" Properties
Name Type Value
Modulus of Elasticity Temperature-Independent 193,000.0 MPa
Poisson's Ratio Temperature-Independent 0.31
Mass Density Temperature-Independent 7.75×10-6 kg/mm³
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion Temperature-Independent 1.36×10-5 1/°C
Thermal Conductivity Temperature-Independent 0.02 W/mm·°C
Specific Heat Temperature-Independent 480.0 J/kg·°C

Table A3.2. "Stainless Steel" Stress Limits
Name Type Value
Tensile Yield Strength Temperature-Independent 207.0 MPa
Tensile Ultimate Strength Temperature-Independent 586.0 MPa
Compressive Yield Strength Temperature-Independent 207.0 MPa
Compressive Ultimate Strength Temperature-Independent 0.0 MPa

Table A3.1. Thermal Conductivity vs. Temperature
Table0003.jpg (512x384 pixels)

A4. Glossary

Alert Criteria
Alerts cause ANSYS to flag results that exceed minimum or maximum allowable values.
Bonded Contact
Prevents contacting regions on selected faces from sliding or separating. "Glues" the faces together.
Bounding Box
A three-dimensional cube aligned to the global x, y and z axes that exactly contains a body or assembly.
Convergence Tracking
Convergence tracking causes ANSYS to iteratively refine the solution until the criteria for allowable change in the result is met or the maximum number of loops is exhausted.
Frictionless Contact
Models standard nonlinear unilateral contact. Allows free sliding and gaps to form at contact interface.
No Separation
Prevents contacting regions on selected faces from separating. Frictionless sliding may occur.
Relevance
Defines the acceptable accuracy for a body and valuates the importance of bodies in an assembly. The relevance range extends from -100 to +100, where -100 implies maximum software speed and +100 implies maximum accuracy in calculating results.
Rough Contact
Nonlinear contact that allows gaps to form at contact interface but does not allow sliding (infinite coefficient of friction).
Scope
Filters a result to selected geometry. If combined with convergence tracking, focuses refinement activity on the selected geometry.
Visible
A user preference that controls the visibility of bodies in figures in this report. Unlike suppressed bodies, invisible bodies are fully considered in the calculation of results.

A5. Distributing This Report

The following table lists the files that you need to include for posting this report to an Internet or Intranet web server or for moving this report to a different location. Store all files in the same folder as the HTML page.

This report was originally generated in the folder "C:\RFQ mechanical drawings\ANSYS\Reports\Cover\English\".

Table A5.1. Files Included In This Report
File Name Description
"Cover.htm" This HTML page.
"StyleSheet.css" The Cascading Style Sheet used to format the HTML page.
"CERNlogo.gif" The Company image displayed at the top of the title page.
"AnsCompanyLogo.gif" The ANSYS image displayed at the top of the title page.
"Table0001.jpg" Table A2.1. "Thermal Conductivity vs. Temperature" Thermal Conductivity vs. Temperature
"Table0002.jpg" Table A2.2. "Alternating Stress vs. Cycles" Alternating Stress vs. Cycles
"Table0003.jpg" Table A3.1. "Thermal Conductivity vs. Temperature" Thermal Conductivity vs. Temperature